Pipeline and lead quality
New leads, the share disqualified, and last week's intake by stage. A coloured dot shows whether the lead filter is still running or has gone quiet.
Case study · Internal tooling
A dashboard in the terminal that pulls five systems into one screen. Press one key on any row and it opens an AI coding session that already knows what you were looking at.
Problem
CRM in one tab, the content queue in another, ads in a third, tasks in a fourth. Half the review was navigation. Worse, when something looked wrong, describing it to an AI assistant meant copying and pasting context out of four systems before any work could start.
New leads, the share disqualified, and last week's intake by stage. A coloured dot shows whether the lead filter is still running or has gone quiet.
How many days of scheduled posts are left, and how many are waiting for review. Green above two weeks, red under one.
The latest spend and click figures per campaign, read from the tracker that already collects them.
What is due and what is overdue, so the review starts from what slipped.
The one interesting key
Every panel builds a description of whatever row is selected: the deal and its stage, the campaign and its numbers, the week and its figures. Press c and the dashboard drops out of the display, starts a Claude Code session in the repo with that description as the opening prompt, and restores itself when you quit.
The gap it closes is small. The cost of using an AI assistant on real work is rarely the model, it is assembling the context. If the tool that shows you the problem also hands the problem over, you use it. If you have to re-type the situation, you do not bother.
Build notes